Search Results
Monday, December 20, 2010
Gratitude
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Zen Dance
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Acting
.
.
If you like to visit my actor's blog, click here.
Friday, November 26, 2010
Shanghai
Also, free enterprise is very much alive here, much more than in the market economies of the 'free world' now bogged down by high taxation, high unemployment, strikes and regulations.
Isn't it an irony that the communists are more open for business than the capitalists and that I feel more free in China than in the West?
.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Driverless Electric Vans
.
.
This is a landmark achievement for driverless car navigation. I wonder how they interact with other cars with drivers. If the video doesn't work, click here.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Bucky Group - Changing Education Paradigms
By K E Pang
Definitely, education should cater to different individuals. But this is not new. About 2,500 years ago, Confucius in China already propounded to “teach according to the material/talent (witty pun too).”
It is true that current public education marginalizes millions of children. While he seem to suggest that all those millions are children with ADHD conditions, I’d like to add that those labeled ADHD are just some of those marginalized, but not the only one. There are others like those with conditions of Dyslexia, Dyspraxia, Autistic spectrum, etc.
There may be some cases of ADHD where drugs may not be the best solution, and may be overused. However, in extreme cases, it is necessary for the safety of others. In have come across several children with severe ADHD coupled with violent tendencies that they actually posed a safety hazard to people around them (children and adults alike) on a daily basis. It was only on days they were sedated that the other children felt safe from harm. Fortunately, most cases of ADHD were not like that.
In his presentation, Ken Robinson appear to tacitly privilege divergent thinking and creativity over other capacities. Divergent thinking and creativity per se, without balance from other capacities may not be very helpful. There are also other capacities like the ability to focus, and act, that are also important for work to get done. Thus the value of convergent thinking and deductive reasoning still have their places for survival and daily living.
In the experiment he quoted on the genius in divergent thinking, he noted that divergent thinking seem to deteriorate with age. He attributed the deterioration to education. However, without proof cited, that is just a speculation.
We know from research that influences on the individual from the mass media and peers are just as strong, if not much stronger, than education institutions. Moreover, brain studies show that there are developmental phases in our physiology that our brain cells and their connections go through pruning – a process of cutting down the very connections that is linked to divergent thinking. Perhaps the causes of deterioration in divergent thinking lay elsewhere?
Ken Robinson seemed to contradict himself towards the end. e.g. he mentioned some individuals study best in solitude, some in small groups, some etc... yet, in his closing remark he mentioned that most learning happen in groups.
This may or may not be the case, for we know some of the most important and profound insights were done in solitude. Especially knowledge of intellect and of emotions. wisdom...which is more than both. Jesus spent years in the wilderness. Buddha attained his enlightenment in solitude meditation under the Bodhi tree.
Moreover, learning in groups may be heaven for some of the ADHDs, but it would be a torture chamber for those on the autistic spectrum, or other individuals who just learn best in solitude.
In that case, was he not just imposing another set of ideas onto what is?
Results of Cutting the A4 paper into a Loop:
Try it yourself. Cut a loop big enough to loop around your body from an A4 size paper without sticky tape and staplers. I'll show you one of the solutions next week!
Postscript:
Monica mentioned about the 12 senses in Wardolf Education. I have checked on the Net and found these:
- Touch
- Life
- Movement
- Equilibrium
- Smell
- Taste
- Vision
- Warmth
- Listening/Hearing
- Word/Language
- Thought
- Ego
.
.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
What I Feel Like Saying...
TEDxNUS
- That a goal you want to achieve 'someday' is not one worthy of you to take up.
- That singapore's human settlement is at least 700 years old, preceding the arrival of Raffles.
- That nobody knows the future in the stock market.
- Why Americans are said to be diverse in culture yet unable to focus on human relations at work.
- Why male spiders are much smaller than it's female partners.
- What Singapore culture is.
- If Singapore's wildlife is reducing or flourishing on the balance.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
My Unique Day in Singapore
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Bucky Group - Making Enzymes
- Fertilizer (replace or reduce use of chemicals), diluted 1:100/500/1000 ratio.
- Insecticide, diluted 1:1000 ratio.
- Pesticide, diluted 1:100 ratio.
- Plant hormone (for fruits and flowers – use on roots, soil), diluted 500 times.
- Anti-odour / air freshener ( pets, laundry, toilets, closets, shoe box, refrigerator), diluted 200 times.
- Shampoo, Washing liquids, Detergents (to reduce chemical side-effects, grime, mould/fungus), 1 teaspoon per 500cc.
- Veggie and Fruit wash – soak fruit and vegetables for 45 minutes to remove harmful pesticide residues, 1 tablespoon per 1000 cc.
- Soothe Insect bites / itch / eczema / scalding - applying on affected areas immediately.
.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Adaptive Imperative
Date: 5 Oct 2010
Venue: NUS Bukit Timah Campus
Speaker: Jeff Chua, Boston Consulting Group
I have attended a talk recently about developing business strategies in turbulent times when it is difficult to see trends beyond two or three years. The speaker mentioned the following observations:
The context of strategy has changed since changes happen frequently.
- Market leadership does not necessarily imply the same extent in profitability.
- It is harder to define industry boundaries.
- It is harder to predict the future.
- Market position is unstable. Those on top do not stay on top for very long.
Example of a Market Leader losing out to latecomer:
Blockbuster vs Netflix
Blockbuster was a market leader in video rental. But on
Netflix is also in the video rental business and started in 1997. It deployed no strategy other than encouraging compulsive dissent and experiments. They tried sending out DVDs on envelopes, posting them and pricing them on a flat fee for as many DVDs customers care to watch. Then they continued to stream videos across different channels. By 2007, they passed the billionth
This, the speaker claimed is evidence of increased unpredictability and turbulence.
Businesses would need to have:
- Responsiveness (agility)
- Resilience (robustness)
- Readiness (anticipation)
- Recursion (experimentation)
Example of two market leaders deploying very different strategies:
Google – using open systems
Apple – using closed proprietary systems.
The speaker continue to suggest that businesses should adapt using their:
- Signal Advantage
- System Advantage
- People Advantage
- Simulation Advantage
- Social Advantage.
My opinion:
I think the speaker had focused too much on the form and not enough on the essence of the apparent ‘changes’.
The underlying common denominator of the current observations is merely the advent of technology and its easy and cheap availability. For instance:
- Netflix triumph over Blockbuster because of the former’s clever use of technologies.
- Large companies no longer make the proportional scale of profits as they used to because clever technologies are no longer just affordable by big companies, but they are affordable to small ones too. It is now possible even to become a one-man multi-national company.
So things aren’t that unpredictable or turbulent if we focus on the common denominator of ‘technology’.
Also, while Google appears to be ‘open’ and Apple being ‘closed’ using propriety systems, the commonality is that both makes money through their own propriety ‘orifice’. Google’s orifice is their search engine, while Apple’s is iTunes. And we have another major orifice called Microsoft Windows. Businesses love orifices. So in this respect, they are the same. So there isn’t the unpredictability or turbulence.
In summary, observations may appear different in form, but in essence there are usually common causes. The trick is look beyond the raw data to derive meaningful meta-information. The luminary Buckminster Fuller (Bucky) believed that the universe is one system obeying a set of generalized principles, and that in the early days when equipment are limited in ability and accuracy, different phenomena appeared to behaved differently. That resulted in the formation of different disciplines. So some scientific observations became ‘physics’, some became ‘chemistry’, some became ‘biology’,…etc, but in truth, they all belong to one system in the universe.
By those measures, it doesn't matter if Apple is a computer company, a mobile phone company or a lifestyle company. The fact that businesses have be categorized wrongly as stoke pipe industries with clear boundaries, doesn't mean that they need to continue to be so. A fresh look at them as eco-systems in one universe with their outreach enabled by technology would be closer to the reality.
Once the causes are identified it’ll be easier to help companies to cope up. So now you cure the causes, not the symptom. That means a simpler remedy, but usually that means you cannot sell expensive ‘medicine’ and make a lot of money. Bucky said, “You either make sense or make money, they are both mutually exclusive.” To date, I am still pondering over this question, "Can we make both money and sense?"